Book a fit call

Capabilities directory

Find your team’s next superpower.

Results

9 capabilities

  • Budget-versus-actual variance commentary

    Before the month's results go to management, the finance lead gets written commentary on every line that moved past the threshold: the figures, the budget owner's explanation marked confirmed or to be confirmed, a bridge from budget to actual, and the questions still open. No cause is invented.

  • Candidate outreach drafting

    For each person a recruiter or founder has already chosen to approach about an approved role: a first message and two follow-ups, each personal line traced to a public work source the recruiter supplied, do-not-contact names and opt-outs honoured, and a reply log. The recruiter sends every message.

    • Recruiting and hiring (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)
    • Growth & scaling

  • Funder report draft

    Before a funder report is due, the grants manager gets a draft written to the funder's own questions, with every number tied to a record, an index of the evidence behind each statement and a list of what is still unanswered. People verify it, approve it and submit it.

  • Interview plan and scorecard

    Before the first interview, the hiring manager and every interviewer share one plan: the criteria the role needs, the same questions in the same order for every candidate, and a blank scorecard each person fills in alone. It rates no one. People make every decision about a candidate.

    • Recruiting and hiring (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)
    • Growth & scaling

  • Interview scheduling and candidate confirmation

    For candidates your team has already chosen to interview, the recruiting coordinator gets one scheduling sheet that lines up each candidate's offered times, in their own time zone, with the interviewers' free time, plus a ready confirmation or availability request for each. A person sends every message and invitation.

    • Recruiting and hiring (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)
    • Growth & scaling

  • Program outcome map

    Before an evaluation, the program and evaluation leads get one map linking each activity to the outcome it is meant to serve, with proposed measures, data sources, assumptions and the questions the evidence cannot yet answer. It claims no impact.

    • Analytics and reporting (filtered by)
    • Education (filtered by)
    • Nonprofits (filtered by)

  • Reference check question plan

    After the interviews, the recruiter gets short reference calls aimed only at what the panel still could not establish, put to the referees the candidate named and agreed to, with a note sheet for each call that keeps the referee's own words. It gives no view on the candidate.

    • Recruiting and hiring (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)
    • Growth & scaling

  • Win-loss review

    Once a quarter your sales lead sees, from the deals you closed, where the losses ended, which kinds of deal you win and lose, what the largest deals show, and which findings rest on enough deals to act on. Actions are proposed in proportion to the evidence, and nothing in your sales system is changed.

    • Sales
    • Analytics and reporting (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)

  • Work sample exercise brief

    For one approved role, the hiring manager gets a practical exercise: a bounded task from the role's real work, instructions for the candidate with a time limit and adjustments, and the evidence the panel will look for. The panel judges the work; nothing is rated here.

    • Recruiting and hiring (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)
    • Growth & scaling