Book a fit call

Capabilities directory

Find your team’s next superpower.

Results

14 capabilities

  • Budget-versus-actual variance commentary

    Before the month's results go to management, the finance lead gets written commentary on every line that moved past the threshold: the figures, the budget owner's explanation marked confirmed or to be confirmed, a bridge from budget to actual, and the questions still open. No cause is invented.

  • Candidate outreach drafting

    For each person a recruiter or founder has already chosen to approach about an approved role: a first message and two follow-ups, each personal line traced to a public work source the recruiter supplied, do-not-contact names and opt-outs honoured, and a reply log. The recruiter sends every message.

    • Recruiting and hiring (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)
    • Growth & scaling

  • Funder report draft

    Before a funder report is due, the grants manager gets a draft written to the funder's own questions, with every number tied to a record, an index of the evidence behind each statement and a list of what is still unanswered. People verify it, approve it and submit it.

  • Hiring pipeline status report

    Each week your people lead or founder sees every open role on one page: applications at each stage, days open against the target, roles running late, pass-through between stages, which sources lead to interviews, and every blocker with its owner. It counts; it never assesses a candidate.

    • Recruiting and hiring (filtered by)
    • Analytics and reporting (filtered by)
    • Hospitality (filtered by)

  • Interview plan and scorecard

    Before the first interview, the hiring manager and every interviewer share one plan: the criteria the role needs, the same questions in the same order for every candidate, and a blank scorecard each person fills in alone. It rates no one. People make every decision about a candidate.

    • Recruiting and hiring (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)
    • Hospitality (filtered by)

  • Interview process review after a hiring round

    After a hiring round closes, the recruiting lead gets a review of the interview process: questions that gave no usable evidence, competencies nobody covered, inconsistent rubric use, and revisions to approve before the next search. It reviews the process only; no candidate is assessed.

  • Interview scheduling and candidate confirmation

    For candidates your team has already chosen to interview, the recruiting coordinator gets one scheduling sheet that lines up each candidate's offered times, in their own time zone, with the interviewers' free time, plus a ready confirmation or availability request for each. A person sends every message and invitation.

    • Recruiting and hiring (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)
    • Growth & scaling

  • Job description

    A hiring manager’s rough notes become a job description the right people want to answer: why the role exists, the work itself, and only the must-haves that are real. Your approved pay and employer wording go in untouched, and nothing is posted until the hiring manager and the people lead approve it.

  • Job posting and sourcing plan

    For one approved role, the hiring manager gets a plan for where to post and where to look: every channel on the company's own list ordered by the signal it should give for that kind of role, a week-by-week schedule inside the budget, and what to count on each channel. Nothing is posted or paid until a person approves.

  • Program outcome map

    Before an evaluation, the program and evaluation leads get one map linking each activity to the outcome it is meant to serve, with proposed measures, data sources, assumptions and the questions the evidence cannot yet answer. It claims no impact.

    • Analytics and reporting (filtered by)
    • Nonprofits (filtered by)
    • Education

  • Reference check question plan

    After the interviews, the recruiter gets short reference calls aimed only at what the panel still could not establish, put to the referees the candidate named and agreed to, with a note sheet for each call that keeps the referee's own words. It gives no view on the candidate.

    • Recruiting and hiring (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)
    • Hospitality (filtered by)

  • Website findability audit

    An owner or marketer asking why the website is not found gets a plain report from saved copies of their own pages: what stops each page being reached, read or understood, the fixes in order, and the checks only a live look can settle. No ranking is promised.

  • Win-loss review

    Once a quarter your sales lead sees, from the deals you closed, where the losses ended, which kinds of deal you win and lose, what the largest deals show, and which findings rest on enough deals to act on. Actions are proposed in proportion to the evidence, and nothing in your sales system is changed.

    • Sales
    • Analytics and reporting (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)

  • Work sample exercise brief

    For one approved role, the hiring manager gets a practical exercise: a bounded task from the role's real work, instructions for the candidate with a time limit and adjustments, and the evidence the panel will look for. The panel judges the work; nothing is rated here.

    • Recruiting and hiring (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)
    • Growth & scaling