Capabilities directory

Find your team’s next superpower.

Results

59 capabilities, showing 1 to 24

  • Acceptance criteria sheet

    Hand a developer or agency a story with its definition of done written down: testable expected behaviours, error cases and edge cases, each traced to a rule or design state, with the unclear terms and open questions listed for the product owner.

    • Product management
    • Hardware and physical technology (filtered by)
    • Growth & scaling (filtered by)
  • Annual operating budget

    For an owner or finance lead preparing next year: revenue and costs by month and by team, built from this year's figures and each budget owner's drivers, every assumption written down, capital purchases listed apart, the whole checked against cash, and the questions leadership has to settle.

  • Assumption map

    For a product owner whose plan rests on beliefs nobody has tested: each belief is written down, set against the evidence you hold, ranked by what it would do to the plan, and given a cheap test to choose from. You decide what to test; no evidence is invented.

    • Product management
    • Hardware and physical technology (filtered by)
    • Growth & scaling (filtered by)
  • Board meeting pack

    Before each board meeting, the CEO gets a pre-read built on the one decision the board is asked to make, with every figure from the company's own reports, an agenda kept mostly for discussion and the questions directors are likely to ask. Afterwards, a record of what was decided. The CEO sends it all.

  • Channel partner fit review

    When a referral, reseller or alliance partner approaches, the founder or head of partnerships gets one review: evidence the partner brings customers of its own, the type that evidence supports, a ninety-day plan with signs to go on or stop, and the commission range that still beats selling direct. A person decides.

    • Sales
    • Hardware and physical technology (filtered by)
    • Growth & scaling (filtered by)
  • Component end-of-life exposure brief

    When a supplier announces a component constraint or end-of-life date, the sourcing lead gets one brief: where the part is used, stock and demand set against the stated dates, and questions about replacements, with unverified availability kept apart from approved supply.

  • Culture health check

    A founder or people lead sees whether the company's stated values show up in daily work: each value written as behaviours you could watch for, read against the team's own evidence, with where practice matches, where it drifts, and two or three rituals to try. Reported by team and theme, never about a person.

    • People and HR
    • Nonprofits (filtered by)
    • Growth & scaling (filtered by)
  • Customer feedback themes

    Each month your support lead sees what customers keep telling you: tickets, disputes, reviews and survey comments grouped into themes with counts and quotations, the three issues most worth fixing with a proposed fix and owner, and a note for customers once a fix ships. A person decides every fix.

  • Decision log

    Your chief of staff keeps one register of what the leadership actually approved, across every meeting and message: each decision with who approved it, each action with one owner and a date, what is overdue, and a flag wherever a new decision clashes with an earlier one or revives a rejected idea.

  • Delegation brief and follow-up

    Every task a manager hands over goes with a clear brief: what to deliver, in what form, by what date and time, why it matters, who will use it, what the person may decide alone and when the manager will check in. Each week, one list shows what is open, what is late and the next note to send.

  • Donor thank-you drafts

    Donor services staff get one draft thank-you for each new gift, written from the confirmed gift details, the donor's communication preferences and the organization's approved program language. A person checks and sends every message; nothing asks for another gift.

  • Emergency drill brief

    Before a fire, evacuation or other drill, the site or office manager gets one brief: the scenario the responsible person has approved, who does what, what each observer records, and the questions for the debrief. It writes no emergency plan.

  • Engineering change affected records index

    When an engineering change request enters review, the document controller gets one index: the assemblies, revisions, stock and open purchase orders the change reaches in the exports supplied, and a question for each owner wherever the records are unclear.

  • Evaluation unit trial review

    When a customer's evaluation reaches its review milestone, the account engineer and account owner get a trial-review agenda that sets the agreed use case beside the recorded results, setup changes and feedback, with every gap turned into a question and next-step options.

    • Sales
    • Energy (filtered by)
    • Hardware and physical technology (filtered by)
  • Event plan

    Whoever owns one event, a talk, a dinner, a webinar or a stand, gets one plan: the goal and target, who should be in the room, every step before, on and after the day with a date and an owner, and how each conversation is followed up. Nothing is booked, paid or sent by the assistant.

  • Executive week-ahead calendar review

    Before the week starts, the executive assistant hands the executive one brief: every clash, every journey or run of meetings with too little time, every meeting with no stated purpose or no preparation time, and proposed time for the week's priorities. Nothing is accepted, declined, moved or sent.

  • Field service invoice evidence check

    When completed field work is ready for invoicing, the billing manager gets draft billing lines that tie the agreed rates to crew time, equipment use, mobilization and signed service tickets. Unsigned tickets, overlapping equipment days and unsupported extras are listed as exceptions.

  • Hiring pipeline status report

    Each week your people lead or founder sees every open role on one page: applications at each stage, days open against the target, roles running late, pass-through between stages, which sources lead to interviews, and every blocker with its owner. It counts; it never assesses a candidate.

  • Interview plan and scorecard

    Before the first interview, the hiring manager and every interviewer share one plan: the criteria the role needs, the same questions in the same order for every candidate, and a blank scorecard each person fills in alone. It rates no one. People make every decision about a candidate.

  • Interview process review after a hiring round

    After a hiring round closes, the recruiting lead gets a review of the interview process: questions that gave no usable evidence, competencies nobody covered, inconsistent rubric use, and revisions to approve before the next search. It reviews the process only; no candidate is assessed.

  • Investor update

    Each month or quarter, the founder gets a drafted update for investors: the headline, key figures against plan and last period, cash and runway, wins, problems told plainly with what is being done, and specific asks. Every figure comes from the company's own reports. The founder approves and sends it.

  • Job description

    A hiring manager’s rough notes become a job description the right people want to answer: why the role exists, the work itself, and only the must-haves that are real. Your approved pay and employer wording go in untouched, and nothing is posted until the hiring manager and the people lead approve it.

  • Job posting and sourcing plan

    For one approved role, the hiring manager gets a plan for where to post and where to look: every channel on the company's own list ordered by the signal it should give for that kind of role, a week-by-week schedule inside the budget, and what to count on each channel. Nothing is posted or paid until a person approves.

  • Job readiness packet

    Before an order goes to the floor, the production or quality lead gets one packet: each requirement matched to its approved drawing, specification or inspection plan, with conflicting revisions, gaps and material shortfalls listed. The owners decide; nothing is approved or released.