Book a fit call

Capabilities directory

Find your team’s next superpower.

Results

100 capabilities, showing 1 to 24

  • Acceptance criteria sheet

    Hand a developer or agency a story with its definition of done written down: testable expected behaviours, error cases and edge cases, each traced to a rule or design state, with the unclear terms and open questions listed for the product owner.

  • AI visibility audit for an online store

    A store owner or marketer gets a dated audit of how the store reads to AI assistants and shopping agents, from its own saved public pages: eighteen fixed checks with evidence, a fix list in priority order, and a record of what the assistants actually said. Nothing on the store is changed.

  • Analysis plan

    Before anyone opens the spreadsheet, the owner or manager gets a one-page plan: the question restated, the hypotheses, the fields and periods needed, and the result that would change the decision. It runs no analysis and states no finding. You own the question and the criteria.

  • Annual operating budget

    For an owner or finance lead preparing next year: revenue and costs by month and by team, built from this year's figures and each budget owner's drivers, every assumption written down, capital purchases listed apart, the whole checked against cash, and the questions leadership has to settle.

  • Assumption map

    For a product owner whose plan rests on beliefs nobody has tested: each belief is written down, set against the evidence you hold, ranked by what it would do to the plan, and given a cheap test to choose from. You decide what to test; no evidence is invented.

  • Audit evidence index

    The quality lead gets an index of everything an audit has asked to see: each request linked to the document that answers it, its version and owner, the records found and the gaps. The quality owner decides what is shared; nothing is certified or sent.

  • Batch distribution trace

    When the quality lead needs to know where one production batch went, they get a map from the batch record to every recorded shipment: quantities, transfers and repacking links, with each gap in the trace written as a question. It decides no hold and contacts nobody.

  • Board meeting pack

    Before each board meeting, the CEO gets a pre-read built on the one decision the board is asked to make, with every figure from the company's own reports, an agenda kept mostly for discussion and the questions directors are likely to ask. Afterwards, a record of what was decided. The CEO sends it all.

  • Brand strategy workshop

    Give your company one answer to why it exists, who it is for and how it sounds. Over about three hours (a planning figure, not yet timed), the owner makes the six choices that define the brand from options an AI assistant drafts, signs off the rest, and leaves with the tests that check it with real buyers.

  • Budget-versus-actual variance commentary

    Before the month's results go to management, the finance lead gets written commentary on every line that moved past the threshold: the figures, the budget owner's explanation marked confirmed or to be confirmed, a bridge from budget to actual, and the questions still open. No cause is invented.

  • Business line investment review

    For leadership with several business lines: each line set side by side on one basis (fit with strategy, finance-reviewed results, shared resources, open questions) and placed as invest, investigate or reduce commitment, for the leadership team to discuss and decide.

  • Business model assumptions review

    Before you commit money to a new or revised business model, see it block by block with every claim marked evidenced or assumed, the riskiest assumptions ranked, and the cheapest test for each. You choose what to test; no projection or valuation is made.

  • Buyer security questionnaire answers

    When a buyer sends a security questionnaire, your sales owner gets a draft answer matrix: each question beside the evidence your security owner supplied, its date, its limits and a named reviewer, with stale, partial and unverifiable answers marked.

  • Channel partner fit review

    When a referral, reseller or alliance partner approaches, the founder or head of partnerships gets one review: evidence the partner brings customers of its own, the type that evidence supports, a ninety-day plan with signs to go on or stop, and the commission range that still beats selling direct. A person decides.

  • Client campaign performance report

    At the weekly or monthly reporting cutoff, the analyst gets a client report in the agency's format from the exports supplied: source figures, a drafted narrative, anomalies and discussion points. Gaps stay gaps, and every explanation is labelled a hypothesis.

  • Client report check log

    Before a batch of client reports is released, the reporting lead gets a log, report by report, of household membership, periods, totals against the custodian statements, fee figures and missing sections, with every difference marked for correction. Nothing is released or sent.

  • Comparison claim check

    A manager holding a claim such as "version B converts better" and two groups of numbers gets back the method used, the size of the difference, how uncertain it is, the assumptions checked, and plain wording for what the data does and does not support. The manager decides what to do.

  • Completed engagement file review

    The quality partner gets a worksheet that tests finished engagement files against the firm's own checklist: each item linked to the engagement letter, workpaper or sign-off that answers it, with any open finding, and the missing evidence listed. The quality partner confirms findings and assigns remediation.

  • Component inventory audit

    When patterns come up for review, the design-system owner gets an inventory built from the library export and its documentation: every component with its naming, token and state gaps, and the pairs that may overlap. Nothing is merged on appearance; the owner decides.

  • Cost of poor quality worksheet

    An owner or operations lead who senses that rework, scrap and returns are costly gets one worksheet: the failure costs already on record, sorted by category, with estimates, gaps and unresolved allocations listed. The owner decides what to fix first.

  • Course catalog quality check

    The registrar's office gets one comparison of a department's course updates against the current catalog export: codes, titles, credits, descriptions and linked components, row by row, with every conflict set out as a question for academic review. No catalog record is changed.

  • Course sequence and workload review

    A course lead revising an outline for the next cohort gets a module map: learning goals, prerequisites, activities and the instructor's own time estimates, with crowded weeks and coverage gaps marked and every gap written as a question. The course lead decides what changes.

  • Creative fatigue review

    When a campaign's reach or response pattern prompts a creative review, the paid media lead gets frequency and response set against the campaign's own baseline, by creative and audience, with other explanations marked and options to test.

  • Creative test evidence review

    When a batch of ad creative is ready for review, the creative strategist and media lead get an evidence table by creative, angle, format and hook, with tentative learning and next-test options. No winner or loser is named, and thin evidence is held back.