Information security workflows,
powered by AI.

The alert needs context. The access exception outlived its purpose. The questionnaire asks for evidence nobody has assembled. Find the preparation your security team repeats.

Browse every work area
Which alert needs action?Corroborating events, affected assets and the gaps behind the severity label.Who still needs that access?Current grants, role changes, secrets and data reaching the logs.What should we fix first?Exposure, usable fixes, dependency evidence and design questions.Can you support that answer?Questionnaires, control records and policies with named review owners.

Built for the AI you already use.

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • Copilot
  • Gemini

Explore the work behind the next decision.

Start with a job you recognize. Open it to see what gets prepared, the questions that remain and where a person decides.

Illustrative workflows, adapted to your own procedures and standards. Each needs to be scoped to your operation. Scheduling and system connections are possible setups, scoped separately. People retain the decisions shown.

Access and sensitive data

Review protection decisions and give administrators a clear, approved change request.

The scheduled access review opensAn entitlement review queue with owners, role conflicts and exceptions

Bring the reason for each grant back into view.

Bring these each run
Account and group exports, role definitions, privilege records and exception dates.
The person decides
The security reviewer recommends changes; system owners approve retained or removed access.
Keep the exceptions visible
Shared accounts, emergency access and service identities need explicit owners and separate reasoning.
Work it connects
Security, IT and system owners.

Possible setup. From an approved export. On a schedule, with review.

A credential exposure or rotation request is raisedA dependency map, rotation sequence and verification checklist

Plan the rotation before invalidating the key.

Bring these each run
Secret metadata, consumer inventory, access logs and approved rotation procedures; no secret values.
The person decides
The security lead sets urgency; system owners approve and verify the rotation.
Keep the exceptions visible
Unknown consumers or emergency credentials require a recovery path before revocation.
Work it connects
Security, IT and engineering.

Possible setup. From approved files. When an agreed event happens.

A logging change needs a security reviewA source-linked list of sensitive data paths and uncertain cases

Find sensitive content on its way to the logs.

Bring these each run
Changed source files, logging configuration and approved redacted log samples.
The person decides
The security reviewer confirms findings and agrees remediation with engineering.
Keep the exceptions visible
A guard in source code is not proof that every logging path is protected.
Work it connects
Security and engineering.

Possible setup. From approved files. On request.

Application risk

Connect technical findings to exposure and a decision about what changes next.

A new vulnerability scan completesA ranked finding brief with asset owners, scan dates and available fixes

Put exposure beside severity.

Bring these each run
Scan export, asset criticality, exposure records and patch availability.
The person decides
Security sets remediation priority; IT or engineering approves the implementation plan.
Keep the exceptions visible
Stale scans limit conclusions. Findings without a patch need a separate mitigation decision.
Work it connects
Security, IT and engineering.

Possible setup. From an approved export. When an agreed event happens.

A new service or material design change is proposedA threat model with trust boundaries, scenarios and unanswered owner questions

Make the design risks discussable.

Bring these each run
Design files, data flows, source context and prior findings within the agreed scope.
The person decides
The security architect and service owner choose mitigations and accept residual risk.
Keep the exceptions visible
Separate owner statements from verified behavior; incomplete architecture remains an explicit gap.
Work it connects
Security, engineering and service owners.

Possible setup. From approved files. On request.

A dependency review is requestedA risk brief covering resolved versions, advisories and maintenance concerns

Review what the dependency tree brings with it.

Bring these each run
Manifests, lockfiles, dated advisory evidence and repository metadata.
The person decides
Security validates the risk; maintainers choose an upgrade, replacement or documented exception.
Keep the exceptions visible
Unsupported lockfile formats and unresolved versions cannot support version-specific conclusions.
Work it connects
Security and engineering.

Possible setup. From approved files. On request.

Detection and response

Assemble investigation evidence while responders retain control of classification and containment.

An in-scope security alert arrivesA grouped alert brief with corroborating events and proposed investigation steps

Give the alert its surrounding events.

Bring these each run
Separately scoped security connection, alert records, asset context and recent related events.
The person decides
The security analyst classifies the alert and authorizes case or containment actions.
Keep the exceptions visible
A threatening rule name alone is not proof. Incomplete context can remain unclassified.
Work it connects
Security operations and system owners.

Possible setup. Through a scoped connection. When an agreed event happens.

A security investigation needs a common timelineA dated evidence sequence with confirmed facts and competing explanations

Reconstruct what happened across the affected assets.

Bring these each run
Detection export, asset records, related vulnerabilities and responder notes.
The person decides
The incident lead confirms the timeline and chooses containment or further investigation.
Keep the exceptions visible
Normalize time zones; missing telemetry does not establish that activity stopped.
Work it connects
Security operations, IT and engineering.

Possible setup. From an approved export. When an agreed event happens.

A responder asks about the possible spread of an incidentAn asset relationship map with exposure questions and unverified links

See what else the affected system can reach.

Bring these each run
Authorized asset connection, relationship records, detections and vulnerability context.
The person decides
The incident lead decides which related systems need investigation or isolation.
Keep the exceptions visible
A relationship shows possible reach, not confirmed compromise. Unobserved systems remain unknown.
Work it connects
Security operations and infrastructure owners.

Possible setup. Through a scoped connection. On request.

The agreed detection review is dueA noise analysis with proposed exceptions and test cases

Explain the rule that keeps waking the team.

Bring these each run
Rule definitions, alert history, analyst dispositions and known legitimate activity.
The person decides
The detection owner approves a scoped change after checking retained threat coverage.
Keep the exceptions visible
Frequent alerts are not necessarily false positives. Broad suppression can hide useful signals.
Work it connects
Security operations and detection engineers.

Possible setup. From an approved export. On a schedule, with review.

Exercises and awareness

Prepare for difficult judgment calls before the next real incident.

The team plans a response exerciseA scenario script, decision prompts, participant roles and debrief record

Rehearse the decisions that slow an incident.

Bring these each run
Response plan, escalation contacts, prior lessons and counsel-supplied notification instructions.
The person decides
The security exercise owner approves the scenario; participants own their response decisions.
Keep the exceptions visible
Keep invented exercise events labeled. Counsel supplies legal deadlines and notification judgments.
Work it connects
Security, IT, leadership and legal.

Possible setup. From approved files. On request.

A phishing simulation reporting period closesA trend brief with reporting behavior and training follow-up questions

Find the lesson behind the simulation results.

Bring these each run
Campaign exports, participant cohorts, delivery records and training completion data.
The person decides
The security awareness owner chooses training follow-up with appropriate managers.
Keep the exceptions visible
Different campaigns may not be comparable; do not treat a click as proof of intent or individual blame.
Work it connects
Security awareness and people managers.

Possible setup. From an approved export. On a schedule, with review.

An employee submits a suspicious-call transcriptAn evidence-linked risk note with verification and escalation options

Spot the pressure in a suspicious call.

Bring these each run
Approved transcript, claimed caller identity and the agreed verification procedure.
The person decides
The security analyst decides how to verify the caller through a trusted channel.
Keep the exceptions visible
A transcript cannot prove identity or voice cloning. Do not repeat credentials or payment details.
Work it connects
Security, IT service desk and the affected employee.

Possible setup. From approved files. When an agreed event happens.

Security evidence

Prepare factual security records for the people who approve claims and disclosures.

A buyer or insurer sends a security questionnaireA draft answer matrix with evidence dates and verification gaps

Answer with evidence, or leave a visible gap.

Bring these each run
Questionnaire, approved policies, configuration exports and recent test records.
The person decides
Security validates technical answers and approves disclosure with the responsible business owner.
Keep the exceptions visible
A written policy does not establish implementation; partial coverage stays partial.
Work it connects
Security, IT, sales and insurance owners.

Possible setup. From approved files. When an agreed event happens.

An audit evidence collection window opensAn indexed packet with missing periods, owners and control-test records

Put the control record beside the control statement.

Bring these each run
Agreed control list, dated access reviews, change approvals, incident records and test evidence.
The person decides
The security control owner verifies the packet; the audit lead or assessor judges sufficiency.
Keep the exceptions visible
Do not reconstruct missing historical evidence or infer certification from a complete folder.
Work it connects
Security, compliance and auditors.

Possible setup. From an approved export. On a schedule, with review.

A security policy needs revisionA draft with scope, responsibilities, review dates and unresolved decisions

Give the policy an operational owner.

Bring these each run
Approved security requirements, existing policy, system inventory and owner instructions.
The person decides
The security lead approves operational requirements; legal and compliance owners review their provisions.
Keep the exceptions visible
Draft text does not establish that a control operates or that a requirement is met.
Work it connects
Security, IT and compliance.

Possible setup. From approved files. On request.

Third-party tools

Assess the security questions a new supplier or assistant add-on introduces.

A proposed supplier will access company systems or dataA scoped security question set and evidence-gap assessment

Ask for the evidence this supplier needs to provide.

Bring these each run
Proposed access, data flows, supplier responses and approved security requirements.
The person decides
Security recommends conditions or rejection; the business owner accepts the remaining risk.
Keep the exceptions visible
A certificate may cover a different service or period. Legal decides contract language.
Work it connects
Security, procurement, legal and the sponsoring team.

Possible setup. From approved files. On request.

A team proposes a third-party AI add-onA review brief covering scripts, dependencies, data destinations and unresolved risks

Read the add-on before giving it reach.

Bring these each run
Add-on source files, declared permissions, dependency list and intended use.
The person decides
Security approves, restricts or rejects use; IT owns installation after approval.
Keep the exceptions visible
A clean scan cannot prove safety. Hidden behavior and unsupported dependencies require further review.
Work it connects
Security, IT and the requesting team.

Possible setup. From approved files. When an agreed event happens.

From “I prompt it”
to “it is ready to review.”

Start with a simple version of one job. Make the preparation more automatic as the inputs, rules and review process become reliable.

On request

Bring the files or exports. Run the preparation when you need it, and review what comes back.

First, agree the useful output.

On a schedule

Prepare the review at an agreed interval, with a clear owner for exceptions and missing inputs.

Next, establish access and a review queue.

When something happens

An agreed event starts the preparation. Duplicate records, failures and retries have somewhere to go.

Then, test the trigger and recovery.

The person still approves the payment, releases the work or sends the message. Scheduling and integrations are scoped to the job.

Already have a prompt
that gets you most of the way?

That is a useful starting point. Bring the prompt, an example result and the part you still have to chase or fix.

We can start by examining what you have: its inputs, the exceptions it misses and what would make it reliable enough to hand off.

Describe what you have built
How we build and review the work

Your way of doing the work, ready for the team.

Your security lead knows which exception needs an expiry, which alert needs another source and which answer cannot be signed yet. Fully Powered Studio captures that judgment as reusable preparation with evidence attached.

Fully Powered Studio captures the steps, exceptions and standards in your procedures and your people's experience. They become reusable instructions, templates and checks for the next run.

Capture what works with Fully Powered Studio

Start with the records you already have.

Use approved source files and scoped security exports in your own AI workspace. We build with invented records; your team tests real work without handing over copies. Connections, event routing and schedules are separately scoped, with access and response authority agreed first.

Begin with approved files and exports in your own AI workspace. Live connections and scheduled preparation can be scoped as the work becomes reliable.

Security and your informationWork that crosses systems

AI prepares. Your people decide.

Security owns threat assessment, control evidence and response decisions. IT executes approved internal-system changes. Engineering fixes product code. Compliance and counsel decide regulatory interpretations and notification obligations.

Test ordinary work alongside missing records, conflicting information and unusual cases. A useful output shows what it checked and what it could not assess.

Evals, validation & verification

Build the capability you need next.

Need an access-review routine, detection tuning process or incident exercise? We can adapt public methods to your systems and responsible reviewers, without treating prepared evidence as an assurance opinion.

We select reusable methods and templates, tailor them to your organization, guide first use and refine the package with your team.

Build what's missing

What is your
version of this?

One job is enough to start.

Describe what comes in, what you do now and what you wish would be ready without another prompt.

Prepare a discussion outline. Your answers stay in this browser tab. You can edit and copy the outline to bring to a conversation. Nothing is sent or saved.

Go straight to a fit call

One recurring job.
Or a connected department.

Start with one workflowFind a focused starting point in work you already do.Map your department against thisExplore connected workflows, ownership and implementation.

Existing sprints, scope and pricing are on Get started. Establishing a function? Explore building a new capability.

Which job would you like ready to review?

Bring one noisy alert, access exception or questionnaire. We can map the evidence, prepared output and decision your security owner needs.

Book a 30-minute fit call.