Book a fit call

Capabilities directory

Find your team’s next superpower.

Results

29 capabilities, showing 1 to 24

  • Acceptance criteria sheet

    Hand a developer or agency a story with its definition of done written down: testable expected behaviours, error cases and edge cases, each traced to a rule or design state, with the unclear terms and open questions listed for the product owner.

  • Ad to page check

    When a campaign's landing page is ready for a prelaunch check, the acquisition owner gets a findings list that sets each ad beside the captured page: message, offer details, form and next step, on mobile and desktop. Page states nobody captured are marked unknown.

  • App data requirements

    When the requirements for an internal app leave fields or actions unclear, the business systems analyst gets one data specification: entities, fields, who reads and writes each, and every unresolved name as a question. Nothing is built or changed.

  • Assumption map

    For a product owner whose plan rests on beliefs nobody has tested: each belief is written down, set against the evidence you hold, ranked by what it would do to the plan, and given a cheap test to choose from. You decide what to test; no evidence is invented.

  • Business model assumptions review

    Before you commit money to a new or revised business model, see it block by block with every claim marked evidenced or assumed, the riskiest assumptions ranked, and the cheapest test for each. You choose what to test; no projection or valuation is made.

  • Component inventory audit

    When patterns come up for review, the design-system owner gets an inventory built from the library export and its documentation: every component with its naming, token and state gaps, and the pairs that may overlap. Nothing is merged on appearance; the owner decides.

  • Component specification

    When an approved reusable component needs documenting, the design-system owner gets one specification of its variants, states, usage rules and accessibility notes, set beside the existing patterns, with every gap or clash written as a choice for the owner.

  • CRM field ownership map

    Before a CRM sync or field mapping changes, the systems owner gets a field map from the supplied exports and sample records: each field's source, match keys and conflict rule, with unclear keys, consent fields and duplicates left as questions for each field's owner.

  • Current experience baseline

    Before a redesign, the design lead gets a baseline built from the captures and page list they supply: each page read with its content and design observations, the patterns that recur, and the pages outside the evidence. The lead confirms the baseline and sets the scope.

  • Customer feedback themes

    Each month your support lead sees what customers keep telling you: tickets, disputes, reviews and survey comments grouped into themes with counts and quotations, the three issues most worth fixing with a proposed fix and owner, and a note for customers once a fix ships. A person decides every fix.

  • Customer interview synthesis

    Turn a stack of customer call notes into the answer to one question, in your customers’ own words. Every quotation is cited to the note it came from, every theme shows its confidence and the evidence against it, and nothing is claimed that the notes do not say.

  • Design handoff record

    Before engineering starts, the design owner gets one record built from the approved design: every state, token, breakpoint and content rule either covered or flagged, with each unstated behaviour written as a question. The engineer confirms the questions are resolved.

  • Feedback follow-through updates

    When a change ships or a decision lands on something customers asked for, your account owner gets the list of who asked, the confirmed status of each request, and an individual draft update for each person in the channel they prefer. No update promises a date or feature the team has not confirmed.

  • Household record differences

    When the CRM and the custodian's account export disagree about a household, the operations owner gets one comparison: accounts with no household, possible duplicates and field-by-field differences, each with its source row and a proposed correction left as a question. No record is changed.

  • Journey accessibility findings

    When a user journey is ready for accessibility review, the reviewer gets a finding list: each finding with its task impact and evidence, the manual checks still required and the limits of the review. The reviewer verifies every finding and agrees fixes with the design owner.

  • Lead form field review

    When a client questions a long inquiry form or abandoned submissions, the conversion lead gets a field-by-field review: what each field is used for downstream, where people leave, and proposed labels, error messages and test questions. The lead and the client's data owner decide every change.

  • Notification channel plan

    When a business event needs to notify people, the integration owner gets one channel plan from the event definitions: trigger, urgency, who is told by which channel, what needs confirmation, fallbacks and reply handling. Consent and message rules stay as questions. Nothing is sent.

  • Product pricing options

    A product owner weighing how to price or package a product gets one options brief: what each customer group uses, the willingness-to-pay evidence held with stated kept apart from observed, what each option would bill every account, the uncertainties and the tests. It recommends no price.

  • Product sample feedback revision list

    After each round of samples, your product lead gets one revision list by sample version and feature: the changes people agree on, the feedback that conflicts, and drafted notes for the next supplier brief. The product owner decides.

  • Record sharing access matrix

    When an approved access policy has to reach the CRM, the system owner lays the current sharing setup beside the proposed one, by record type and by role, internal and external. Every change is a question for its owner; inherited and platform-fixed settings are marked unknown.

  • Release notes draft

    The product owner gets draft release notes for one shipped release, in words users recognize: what is new, changed, removed and fixed, the steps users must take, and the known limitations. Only what was supplied is described. The owner checks and publishes.

  • Roadmap tradeoff review

    When a new priority arrives, the product owner sees what the roadmap would have to give up to hold it: the capacity gap by team, the work that could move, the commitments and dependencies that move with it, and the questions still open. The owner decides.

  • Service inbox routing plan

    When a new service inbox is being set up, the service owner gets a routing plan: each approved address, the queue it should reach and who owns it, checks to run before it goes live, and the wrong-address risks, loop risks and unconfirmed queue owners still open. Nothing is configured.

  • Smallest useful release scope

    A product owner or founder with more features than capacity gets one page: what is in the first release and what is deferred, all tied to one user outcome, with the reason for each cut. The owner decides the scope; no effort is estimated beyond what is supplied.