Book a fit call

Capabilities directory

Find your team’s next superpower.

Results

89 capabilities, showing 1 to 24

  • Academic calendar check

    While year, term and session dates are being assembled, your registrar gets a draft calendar with every registration window tied to its term, and every conflicting, missing or out-of-bounds date listed as a question. Nothing is published or changed.

  • AI visibility audit for an online store

    A store owner or marketer gets a dated audit of how the store reads to AI assistants and shopping agents, from its own saved public pages: eighteen fixed checks with evidence, a fix list in priority order, and a record of what the assistants actually said. Nothing on the store is changed.

  • Analysis plan

    Before anyone opens the spreadsheet, the owner or manager gets a one-page plan: the question restated, the hypotheses, the fields and periods needed, and the result that would change the decision. It runs no analysis and states no finding. You own the question and the criteria.

  • Annual operating budget

    For an owner or finance lead preparing next year: revenue and costs by month and by team, built from this year's figures and each budget owner's drivers, every assumption written down, capital purchases listed apart, the whole checked against cash, and the questions leadership has to settle.

  • App data requirements

    When the requirements for an internal app leave fields or actions unclear, the business systems analyst gets one data specification: entities, fields, who reads and writes each, and every unresolved name as a question. Nothing is built or changed.

  • Appointment confirmation and no-show follow-up

    The front desk gets tomorrow’s bookings from the appointment export with the practice’s approved script or message filled in for each, every reply recorded once staff have called, and today’s no-shows with open slots to offer them. Staff make every call and every diary change.

  • Asset register to invoice reconciliation

    When new equipment, transfers or retirements must reach the reporting pack, the asset accountant gets a proposed register update matched to purchase records, commissioning evidence and the ledger, with duplicate IDs, unmatched invoices and uncertain in-service dates listed.

  • Asset replacement options comparison

    When an aging asset has more than one proposed replacement or upgrade, the finance lead and the engineering owner get one workbook: the supplied costs, operating assumptions and lives on one basis, with price-basis gaps, unverified savings and open sensitivity questions marked. It recommends no spend.

  • Bank reconciliation preparation

    Before the month is signed off, your bookkeeper holds one bank reconciliation for one account: every statement line matched to the books or explained, every open item aged, a proof that the two balances agree, and the entries still to make. Nothing is posted until a person approves.

  • Batch distribution trace

    When the quality lead needs to know where one production batch went, they get a map from the batch record to every recorded shipment: quantities, transfers and repacking links, with each gap in the trace written as a question. It decides no hold and contacts nobody.

  • Bill of lading field check

    When a draft bill of lading arrives before it is issued, the documentation specialist gets a field-by-field comparison with the booking, the shipper's instructions and the packing list, with every difference marked. Nothing is issued or corrected.

  • Board minutes draft

    After a board meeting, the secretary gets draft minutes built only from what they supply: notes, agenda, motion text and vote record. Attendance, motions, votes, documents and actions are laid out, and every gap is marked for the secretary to settle.

  • Business continuity plan

    For an owner or operations manager: the activities the business cannot stop for long, how long each can be down and how much data it can lose, what each depends on, the fallback for each, and named owners, deputies, contacts and a test date, ready for a competent reviewer and the owner's approval.

  • Campaign audience check

    When an audience export is ready for review, the campaign owner gets it segmented with reconciled counts, the exclusions applied and the records whose contact status needs checking, with conflicts, stale records and duplicates kept visible.

  • Campaign claim evidence register

    An account lead gets a register that pairs each draft campaign claim with the evidence the client supplied, its source date, proposed qualified wording and the approvals still missing. Unsupported or stale claims are blocked; only approved wording is released.

  • Carrier freight invoice check

    The freight auditor gets a carrier invoice checked line by line against the shipment export and the rate confirmation: duplicate lines, rate differences and extra charges with no delivery or waiting-time record, each tied to its shipment. Accounts payable decides what to pay or dispute.

  • Carrier performance review

    The shipping lead gets a lane-by-lane comparison of carriers from the delivery export and the freight charges: on-time delivery, damage, tracking gaps and cost, each with the shipments behind it. A person decides whether to raise issues or change carrier.

  • Category sourcing plan

    For the buyer or operations lead who owns one spend category, such as packaging or IT hardware: its spend and suppliers on one page, where it sits on a supply-risk and spend matrix, the value levers the evidence supports, and a dated sourcing plan. A person chooses the approach.

  • Churn risk and save plan

    Once a quarter, the owner or account lead sees why customers really left, read from your own cancellation notes and records, how many left for each cause, and one change to try for each, with an owner, a start date and the count that will show whether it helped. A person decides every change.

  • Client schedule to ledger reconciliation

    When a client's subledger schedule and trial balance disagree, the responsible accountant gets one worksheet: both balances proved, every timing difference and unexplained entry listed, and the next step for each. Nothing is posted; every explanation waits for a person.

  • Comparison claim check

    A manager holding a claim such as "version B converts better" and two groups of numbers gets back the method used, the size of the difference, how uncertain it is, the assumptions checked, and plain wording for what the data does and does not support. The manager decides what to do.

  • Complaint and refund request handling

    A customer complains or asks for money back, and whoever handles it gets your policy's answer: the order matched, each condition checked, the amount worked out, any refund set out for a named person to approve, and a reply ready to edit and send.

  • Cost of poor quality worksheet

    An owner or operations lead who senses that rework, scrap and returns are costly gets one worksheet: the failure costs already on record, sorted by category, with estimates, gaps and unresolved allocations listed. The owner decides what to fix first.

  • Course catalog quality check

    The registrar's office gets one comparison of a department's course updates against the current catalog export: codes, titles, credits, descriptions and linked components, row by row, with every conflict set out as a question for academic review. No catalog record is changed.