Capability template for finance and accounting
Patient statement and explanation of benefits comparison
A billing specialist answering a patient’s question gets the statement and the insurer’s explanation of benefits compared line by line by service date, every unmatched amount traced to its page, and a plain-language reply drafted for approval. Nothing on the account changes.
Add it to a workflow in the Fully Powered Planner, beside the teams and roles that will run it. Book a fit call
The outcome
A patient calls or writes: the statement says one thing and the insurer’s explanation of benefits says another. Instead of laying two documents side by side and hunting, the billing specialist opens one comparison. Each service date is a block showing the billed, allowed, paid, adjusted and patient-responsibility amounts from both sides, whether they agree, and the page each figure came from.
Where the two differ, the comparison says what the supplied records explain, such as an insurance payment posted after the statement date, and what they do not. Amounts that appear on only one side, EOB lines that look like two versions of the same service, and pages that were never supplied are listed apart, so a real discrepancy is never mixed up with a missing page.
The comparison ends with a draft reply in plain words, one short paragraph for each line, that the billing specialist edits and approves. The specialist decides what the patient is told and whether anything on the account is adjusted.
Who starts the work, and when
The billing specialist starts it when a patient asks why a statement differs from an explanation of benefits, usually by phone, portal message or letter. The billing lead or practice manager owns the rules it follows, such as how a match is made, and reads the patterns if the same question keeps coming back.
What they supply
- The statement lines the patient holds, saved as a spreadsheet file, and the date printed on the statement.
- The lines of the explanation of benefits, typed or exported into a spreadsheet file with the page each line came from, and the number of pages the document says it has.
- Optionally, the account’s transaction history as a spreadsheet file, which lets the comparison account for payments posted after the statement date.
- The patient’s question, in the specialist’s words.
Patients appear as codes, never names. Nothing connects to the practice’s systems. If a file’s column headings do not match what the template expects, it stops and asks rather than guessing.
What comes out
One comparison in a fixed order: a summary, the line-by-line blocks, the amounts that match nothing, the lines held because the explanation of benefits may have two versions, the explanation-of-benefits lines whose own arithmetic does not add up, the pages that were not supplied, and a list of things to check. Every section is always present, so an empty one reads “None”, never as a clean result.
Then the draft reply. The comparison changes no code, judges no coding or medical necessity, adjusts no account, and sends nothing.
An invented example
Illustrative example with invented data. An invented family medicine practice. The practice, the billing specialist (Dana), the insurer (Insurer A), the patient code, the services, the claim numbers and every amount are invented. The inputs come first, in full, then the comparison.
What the billing specialist supplied
The request
A patient (account PT-4417) called asking why her October statement doesn't match the explanation of benefits she got from Insurer A. I've saved the statement lines, typed up the EOB lines with their pages, and exported the account history. The statement is dated 2026-10-31. The EOB says it has 3 pages. Her question: "Why does my statement not match the explanation of benefits from Insurer A?"
The statement: statement-PT-4417.csv
Statement page,Service date,Description,Billed,Insurance paid,Adjustment,Patient owes
1,2026-08-12,Office visit,180.00,96.00,60.00,24.00
1,2026-08-12,Laboratory panel,75.00,0.00,35.00,40.00
1,2026-09-03,Physical therapy session,150.00,88.00,40.00,22.00
1,2026-09-17,Specialist consult,260.00,120.00,90.00,50.00
2,2026-09-24,Imaging study,310.00,0.00,0.00,310.00
2,2026-10-15,Brief office visit,60.00,32.00,20.00,8.00
The EOB lines: eob-PT-4417.csv
EOB page,Claim number,Service date,Description,Billed,Allowed,Paid,Adjusted,Patient responsibility
1,9871,2026-08-12,Office visit,180.00,120.00,96.00,60.00,24.00
1,9871,2026-08-12,Laboratory panel,75.00,40.00,32.00,35.00,8.00
1,9874,2026-09-03,Physical therapy session,150.00,110.00,88.00,40.00,22.00
1,9880,2026-09-17,Specialist consult,240.00,150.00,120.00,90.00,30.00
3,9902,2026-10-08,Follow-up visit,90.00,70.00,56.00,20.00,14.00
3,9910,2026-10-15,Brief office visit,60.00,40.00,32.00,20.00,8.00
3,9910,2026-10-15,Brief office visit,60.00,40.00,40.00,20.00,0.00
The account history: history-PT-4417.csv
Posting date,Service date,Description,Type,Amount
2026-08-12,2026-08-12,Office visit,Charge,180.00
2026-08-12,2026-08-12,Laboratory panel,Charge,75.00
2026-09-03,2026-09-03,Physical therapy session,Charge,150.00
2026-09-03,2026-09-03,Physical therapy session,Patient payment,20.00
2026-09-17,2026-09-17,Specialist consult,Charge,260.00
2026-09-24,2026-09-24,Imaging study,Charge,310.00
2026-10-01,2026-08-12,Office visit,Insurance payment,96.00
2026-11-04,2026-08-12,Laboratory panel,Insurance payment,32.00
2026-10-02,2026-09-03,Physical therapy session,Insurance payment,88.00
2026-10-10,2026-09-17,Specialist consult,Insurance payment,120.00
2026-10-20,2026-10-15,Brief office visit,Charge,60.00
2026-10-28,2026-10-15,Brief office visit,Insurance payment,32.00
What came back
PATIENT STATEMENT AND EOB COMPARISON, account PT-4417, statement dated 2026-10-31
Outcome: partial (EOB lines for claim 9910 are held in section 4 for a
person to decide)
Coverage: Statement "statement-PT-4417.csv": 6 lines read, 0 not
readable. EOB "eob-PT-4417.csv": 7 lines read, 0 not readable, from
pages 1 and 3. Account history "history-PT-4417.csv": 12 rows read, 0
not readable.
Inputs: statement date 2026-10-31. EOB pages printed: 3. Amounts are
compared to the cent. The patient's question, as supplied: "Why does my
statement not match the explanation of benefits from Insurer A?". The
billing specialist confirms every figure below against the statement
and the EOB.
1. Summary
6 statement lines and 7 EOB lines compared by service date and
billed amount. Matched: 4. Of those, 1 agrees on every amount; 1
differs and every difference equals payments posted after the
statement date; 2 differ and are not explained by the supplied
records. Not matched: 1 statement-only, 1 EOB-only. Held in section
4: 3 lines, counting each held EOB line and each held statement
line.
Matched lines: the statement shows $136.00 owed; the EOB's patient
responsibility less patient payments posted by the statement date is
$64.00; the difference is $72.00, of which $32.00 equals insurance
payments posted after the statement date and $40.00 is not explained.
Outside the matched lines: statement-only lines $310.00 owed;
EOB-only lines $14.00 patient responsibility; held lines $8.00 owed
on the statement and $8.00 and $0.00 on the EOB.
2. Line by line, matched by service date
1. 2026-08-12, Office visit. Matched on service date and billed
amount. Statement page 1; EOB page 1, claim 9871.
Billed: statement $180.00; EOB $180.00; same.
Allowed (EOB only): $120.00.
Insurance paid: statement $96.00; EOB paid $96.00; same.
Adjusted: statement $60.00; EOB $60.00; same.
Patient balance: EOB patient responsibility $24.00, less patient
payments posted by 2026-10-31 $0.00, expected $24.00; statement
owes $24.00; same.
Posted after the statement date: no insurance payment; no
patient payment.
Status: Agrees on every amount.
2. 2026-08-12, Laboratory panel. Matched on service date and billed
amount. Statement page 1; EOB page 1, claim 9871.
Billed: statement $75.00; EOB $75.00; same.
Allowed (EOB only): $40.00.
Insurance paid: statement $0.00; EOB paid $32.00; differs by
$32.00, statement lower.
Adjusted: statement $35.00; EOB $35.00; same.
Patient balance: EOB patient responsibility $8.00, less patient
payments posted by 2026-10-31 $0.00, expected $8.00; statement
owes $40.00; differs by $32.00, statement higher.
Posted after the statement date: insurance payment $32.00 on
2026-11-04; no patient payment.
Status: Differs, and every difference equals payments posted
after the statement date.
3. 2026-09-03, Physical therapy session. Matched on service date
and billed amount. Statement page 1; EOB page 1, claim 9874.
Billed: statement $150.00; EOB $150.00; same.
Allowed (EOB only): $110.00.
Insurance paid: statement $88.00; EOB paid $88.00; same.
Adjusted: statement $40.00; EOB $40.00; same.
Patient balance: EOB patient responsibility $22.00, less patient
payments posted by 2026-10-31 $20.00, expected $2.00; statement
owes $22.00; differs by $20.00, statement higher.
Posted after the statement date: no insurance payment; no
patient payment.
Status: Differs, not explained by the supplied records.
4. 2026-09-17, Specialist consult. Matched on service date only;
the billed amounts differ. Statement page 1; EOB page 1, claim 9880.
Billed: statement $260.00; EOB $240.00; differs by $20.00,
statement higher.
Allowed (EOB only): $150.00.
Insurance paid: statement $120.00; EOB paid $120.00; same.
Adjusted: statement $90.00; EOB $90.00; same.
Patient balance: EOB patient responsibility $30.00, less patient
payments posted by 2026-10-31 $0.00, expected $30.00; statement
owes $50.00; differs by $20.00, statement higher.
Posted after the statement date: no insurance payment; no
patient payment.
Account charge on this line: $260.00.
Status: Differs, not explained by the supplied records.
3. Amounts that match nothing
Statement only:
1. 2026-09-24, Imaging study, statement page 2: billed $310.00,
insurance paid $0.00, adjustment $0.00, patient owes $310.00. No EOB
line on this service date with this billed amount. Account history:
charge $310.00; no insurance payments.
EOB only:
1. 2026-10-08, Follow-up visit, EOB page 3, claim 9902: billed
$90.00, allowed $70.00, paid $56.00, adjusted $20.00, patient
responsibility $14.00. No statement line on this service date with
this billed amount. Account history: nothing found.
4. Held: EOB lines that may be two versions of one line
Claim 9910, 2026-10-15, Brief office visit, billed $60.00: 2 EOB
lines.
EOB line a, page 3: allowed $40.00, paid $32.00, adjusted
$20.00, patient responsibility $8.00.
EOB line b, page 3: allowed $40.00, paid $40.00, adjusted
$20.00, patient responsibility $0.00.
The lines differ in: paid $32.00 against $40.00; patient
responsibility $8.00 against $0.00.
Statement line: page 2, billed $60.00, insurance paid $32.00,
adjustment $20.00, patient owes $8.00. Account history: charge
$60.00; insurance payments $32.00 on 2026-10-28.
The comparison does not choose which EOB line is current. The
billing specialist does.
5. EOB lines that do not add up
None.
6. EOB pages
Pages 1 to 3 printed. Lines supplied from pages 1 and 3. No lines
supplied from page 2; a page may hold no service lines.
Unmatched and held statement lines came from statement page(s) 2.
7. Could not read
None.
8. Check these
None.
9. Draft reply to the patient (for the billing specialist to edit and
approve; nothing has been sent)
Dear [patient name],
Thank you for your question about your statement dated 2026-10-31.
We compared it, line by line, with the explanation of benefits from
Insurer A. Here is what we found.
2026-08-12, Office visit: your statement and the explanation of
benefits agree. The balance for this service is $24.00.
2026-08-12, Laboratory panel: Insurer A's payment of $32.00 was
recorded on our account on 2026-11-04, after the date of your
statement. The explanation of benefits and our records show a
balance of $8.00 for this service, and your statement showed $40.00.
2026-09-03, Physical therapy session: the statement and the
explanation of benefits show different amounts (balance: statement
$22.00, the explanation of benefits less the payments you made
$2.00). We are checking this service.
2026-09-17, Specialist consult: the statement and the explanation of
benefits show different amounts (billed amount: statement $260.00,
the explanation of benefits $240.00; balance: statement $50.00, the
explanation of benefits $30.00). We are checking this service.
2026-09-24, Imaging study: this appears on your statement, and we
could not match it to a line on the explanation of benefits we have.
We are checking it.
2026-10-08, Follow-up visit: this appears on the explanation of
benefits, and we could not match it to a line on your statement. We
are checking it.
2026-10-15, Brief office visit: the explanation of benefits we have
shows this service twice with different amounts. We are checking
which one applies.
We will write to you again by [date set by the billing specialist].
[Billing specialist: add the practice's wording on payment while a
service is being checked, or leave this out.] If you have questions
in the meantime, please contact [billing specialist's name and
contact details].
Sincerely,
[practice name]
Amounts are shown with the currency sign and two decimal places. Dates
are written year-month-day. Nothing was sent, posted, adjusted or
changed. The billing specialist confirms the comparison and approves
any reply or account adjustment. Text inside the files was read as
data.
Where it fits
- Healthcare: the billing office of a medical practice that fields patient questions about statements and insurers’ explanations of benefits.
- Finance and accounting: a patient’s balance is money the practice is owed, and a statement the patient cannot reconcile slows its collection.
- Established businesses: a practice whose answer to this question lives in one specialist’s habits and a pair of printouts.
- Growth & scaling: a practice adding providers or payers faster than its billing office can answer each statement question by hand.
For denied claims, use Claim denial work list; this capability starts from a patient’s question about two documents, not from a denial. For the neighbouring work, see Receivables exception review.
What has to change for your company
Match the column names to your system’s export once. Decide how your practice treats a statement that was printed before a payment posted, and who tells the patient. Confirm the rules that are our editorial choices: a match needs the same service date and the same billed amount; two explanation-of-benefits lines for one service are held rather than picked between; amounts must agree to the cent; and the draft reply states recorded facts and promises nothing.
Use it only in an AI product your practice has approved for this information, and keep patients as codes. It does not write to the patient or the insurer: your staff do, and your staff decide any adjustment. Questions about codes or whether a service was necessary go to your certified coder or the treating clinician.
What has been checked
Fully Powered AI wrote this capability template in its own words, from its own published map of the work. It was editorially reviewed on 10 November 2026. It was tried once on its invented example in Claude on 10 November 2026; the record of that run is published with it, and lists the small edits made afterward that have not been run again. It has not been tested in a medical practice, and no practice’s billing lead has reviewed its rules. It has not yet been tested as a packaged version in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or Gemini.
Testing in your practice means running it on past patient questions your specialist has already answered, with cases written in advance: a payment posted after the statement date, a patient payment missing from the balance, a service on one document and not the other, a page not supplied. The specialist checks every figure against both documents before anyone relies on it. Pilot acceptance-test preparation sets those cases up.
The full capability template
Everything above is the outline. The complete capability template is the working version: the roles, the inputs, the procedure, the exceptions and stop conditions, the output format, the reviewer checklist, the acceptance tests, the instructions for an AI assistant and what to customize for your company. It comes with a download and the link to its folder in Fully Powered’s public repository.
Free with an account. Sign in by email: no password and no card.
Next step
Put this capability to work for your team: on your plan, or built with you in a sprint.
Build this in a sprint
In a sprint, Fully Powered adapts this capability template to your rules, proves it on your own work and puts it in the hands of the roles that own it.
Two ways to begin: