Book a fit call

Workflows Directory

Find your team’s next superpower.

Results

11 workflow templates

  • Audit evidence index

    The quality lead gets an index of everything an audit has asked to see: each request linked to the document that answers it, its version and owner, the records found and the gaps. The quality owner decides what is shared; nothing is certified or sent.

    Starts it
    Quality lead
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    6 outputs

  • Bid or no-bid and RFP response plan

    Before anyone starts on a response, your bid manager sees every requirement in the request checked against your own evidence, your bid criteria tested and the buyer questions ready. A named person decides whether to bid; then a dated plan says who does what by when.

    Starts it
    Bid manager
    Brings
    export, notes, document
    Gets
    6 outputs
    • Sales
    • Procurement and suppliers (filtered by)
    • Government (filtered by)

  • Deliverable issue completeness check

    As a calculation, report or drawing package nears issue, the quality reviewer or document controller gets a checklist: missing review records, revisions that disagree between the index, the register and the title block, and citations of out-of-date calculations. Issue stays with the engineers.

    Starts it
    Quality reviewer
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    5 outputs
    • Quality management (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)
    • Construction

  • Estimate basis pack

    An estimator pricing a job from drawings, takeoffs and supplier quotes gets one worksheet: every figure with its quantity source, rate source and date beside it, each exclusion listed and every gap already written as a scope question. The estimator verifies; the bid lead decides the figure.

    Starts it
    Estimator
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    4 outputs
    • Sales
    • Procurement and suppliers (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)

  • Punch list consolidation

    The site manager gets the punch list for the next closeout walk as one list grouped by location and trade, with repeated entries merged, photographs attached and a proposed follow-up date for each open item. Nothing is assigned, closed or accepted.

    Starts it
    Site manager
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    7 outputs

  • RFI review package

    The project engineer gets one packet for each request for information: the register entry, the question word for word, the drawing revisions and specification extracts it touches, earlier responses, and a numbered list of what is unresolved. No answer is proposed.

    Starts it
    Project engineer
    Brings
    export, notes, pasted text
    Gets
    8 outputs

  • RFQ clarification list

    A buyer sending drawings and specifications out for quotation gets one list of missing details, conflicting revisions and ambiguous tolerances, and a record of each supplier's answers. The buyer approves every message; the engineer settles every technical question.

    Starts it
    Buyer
    Brings
    export, notes, pasted text
    Gets
    6 outputs

  • Site observation follow-up

    After a site visit, the visiting engineer and the project manager get one observation report: each field note beside its location, source photograph, drawing revision and any earlier register entry, a proposed follow-up owner, and the questions still open. It assesses no condition.

    Starts it
    Visiting engineer
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    5 outputs
    • Quality management (filtered by)
    • Engineering firms (filtered by)
    • Construction

  • Submittal register review

    The project engineer gets one register of every required submittal: what has arrived, the review status as recorded, the documents still missing and the long-lead items at risk against the date each order must be placed. Nothing is routed, accepted or ordered.

    Starts it
    Project engineer
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    6 outputs

  • Teaching tool vendor data questions

    Before a school or college adopts a teaching tool that would handle student or staff information, the privacy or procurement lead gets a scoped question pack on data flows, access, retention and subprocessors, with each supplied vendor document mapped to the questions and the gaps listed.

    Starts it
    Privacy lead
    Brings
    export, notes, document
    Gets
    5 outputs

  • Three-week look-ahead constraint review

    Before the coordination meeting, the superintendent gets a brief that sets each planned activity of the next three weeks beside what could hold it up: trades sharing an area, unfinished predecessors, open approvals, late deliveries and unanswered RFIs. The superintendent confirms the sequence and assigns the follow-up.

    Starts it
    Project engineer
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    7 outputs