Book a fit call

Workflows Directory

Find your team’s next superpower.

Results

9 workflow templates

  • Course catalog quality check

    The registrar's office gets one comparison of a department's course updates against the current catalog export: codes, titles, credits, descriptions and linked components, row by row, with every conflict set out as a question for academic review. No catalog record is changed.

    Starts it
    Catalog coordinator
    Brings
    export, document
    Gets
    5 outputs

  • Course sequence and workload review

    A course lead revising an outline for the next cohort gets a module map: learning goals, prerequisites, activities and the instructor's own time estimates, with crowded weeks and coverage gaps marked and every gap written as a question. The course lead decides what changes.

    Starts it
    Course lead
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    4 outputs
    • People and HR
    • Quality management (filtered by)
    • Education (filtered by)

  • Engineering change affected records index

    When an engineering change request enters review, the document controller gets one index: the assemblies, revisions, stock and open purchase orders the change reaches in the exports supplied, and a question for each owner wherever the records are unclear.

    Starts it
    Document controller
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    3 outputs

  • Hiring pipeline status report

    Each week your people lead or founder sees every open role on one page: applications at each stage, days open against the target, roles running late, pass-through between stages, which sources lead to interviews, and every blocker with its owner. It counts; it never assesses a candidate.

    Starts it
    People lead
    Brings
    export, notes, document
    Gets
    6 outputs

  • Interview plan and scorecard

    Before the first interview, the hiring manager and every interviewer share one plan: the criteria the role needs, the same questions in the same order for every candidate, and a blank scorecard each person fills in alone. It rates no one. People make every decision about a candidate.

    Starts it
    Hiring manager
    Brings
    notes, document
    Gets
    7 outputs

  • Interview process review after a hiring round

    After a hiring round closes, the recruiting lead gets a review of the interview process: questions that gave no usable evidence, competencies nobody covered, inconsistent rubric use, and revisions to approve before the next search. It reviews the process only; no candidate is assessed.

    Starts it
    Recruiting lead
    Brings
    export, notes
    Gets
    6 outputs

  • Job description

    A hiring manager’s rough notes become a job description the right people want to answer: why the role exists, the work itself, and only the must-haves that are real. Your approved pay and employer wording go in untouched, and nothing is posted until the hiring manager and the people lead approve it.

    Starts it
    Hiring manager
    Brings
    notes, document
    Gets
    2 outputs

  • Job posting and sourcing plan

    For one approved role, the hiring manager gets a plan for where to post and where to look: every channel on the company's own list ordered by the signal it should give for that kind of role, a week-by-week schedule inside the budget, and what to count on each channel. Nothing is posted or paid until a person approves.

    Starts it
    Hiring manager
    Brings
    export, notes, document
    Gets
    4 outputs

  • Reference check question plan

    After the interviews, the recruiter gets short reference calls aimed only at what the panel still could not establish, put to the referees the candidate named and agreed to, with a note sheet for each call that keeps the referee's own words. It gives no view on the candidate.

    Starts it
    Recruiter
    Brings
    export, notes, document
    Gets
    6 outputs