Capabilities directory
Find your team’s next superpower.
- Function: Business systems and integrations
- Function: Design and user experience
- Function: Information security
- Clear all filters
Results
19 capabilities
Ad to page check
When a campaign's landing page is ready for a prelaunch check, the acquisition owner gets a findings list that sets each ad beside the captured page: message, offer details, form and next step, on mobile and desktop. Page states nobody captured are marked unknown.
App data requirements
When the requirements for an internal app leave fields or actions unclear, the business systems analyst gets one data specification: entities, fields, who reads and writes each, and every unresolved name as a question. Nothing is built or changed.
Buyer security questionnaire answers
When a buyer sends a security questionnaire, your sales owner gets a draft answer matrix: each question beside the evidence your security owner supplied, its date, its limits and a named reviewer, with stale, partial and unverifiable answers marked.
Component inventory audit
When patterns come up for review, the design-system owner gets an inventory built from the library export and its documentation: every component with its naming, token and state gaps, and the pairs that may overlap. Nothing is merged on appearance; the owner decides.
Component specification
When an approved reusable component needs documenting, the design-system owner gets one specification of its variants, states, usage rules and accessibility notes, set beside the existing patterns, with every gap or clash written as a choice for the owner.
CRM field ownership map
Before a CRM sync or field mapping changes, the systems owner gets a field map from the supplied exports and sample records: each field's source, match keys and conflict rule, with unclear keys, consent fields and duplicates left as questions for each field's owner.
Current experience baseline
Before a redesign, the design lead gets a baseline built from the captures and page list they supply: each page read with its content and design observations, the patterns that recur, and the pages outside the evidence. The lead confirms the baseline and sets the scope.
Design handoff record
Before engineering starts, the design owner gets one record built from the approved design: every state, token, breakpoint and content rule either covered or flagged, with each unstated behaviour written as a question. The engineer confirms the questions are resolved.
Household record differences
When the CRM and the custodian's account export disagree about a household, the operations owner gets one comparison: accounts with no household, possible duplicates and field-by-field differences, each with its source row and a proposed correction left as a question. No record is changed.
Journey accessibility findings
When a user journey is ready for accessibility review, the reviewer gets a finding list: each finding with its task impact and evidence, the manual checks still required and the limits of the review. The reviewer verifies every finding and agrees fixes with the design owner.
Lead form field review
When a client questions a long inquiry form or abandoned submissions, the conversion lead gets a field-by-field review: what each field is used for downstream, where people leave, and proposed labels, error messages and test questions. The lead and the client's data owner decide every change.
Learning system access review
At term end or after staff change roles, the system owner lays the learning system's user and access exports beside current staff, class assignments and the approved role matrix. Departed users, changed roles and dormant accounts come back as questions for the data owners. Nothing is changed.
Notification channel plan
When a business event needs to notify people, the integration owner gets one channel plan from the event definitions: trigger, urgency, who is told by which channel, what needs confirmation, fallbacks and reply handling. Consent and message rules stay as questions. Nothing is sent.
Record sharing access matrix
When an approved access policy has to reach the CRM, the system owner lays the current sharing setup beside the proposed one, by record type and by role, internal and external. Every change is a question for its owner; inherited and platform-fixed settings are marked unknown.
Service inbox routing plan
When a new service inbox is being set up, the service owner gets a routing plan: each approved address, the queue it should reach and who owns it, checks to run before it goes live, and the wrong-address risks, loop risks and unconfirmed queue owners still open. Nothing is configured.
Teaching tool vendor data questions
Before a school or college adopts a teaching tool that would handle student or staff information, the privacy or procurement lead gets a scoped question pack on data flows, access, retention and subprocessors, with each supplied vendor document mapped to the questions and the gaps listed.
Usability test session plan
Before a prototype or a confusing flow goes in front of users, the research lead and product owner hold one plan: who to recruit, the tasks in plain words, the neutral prompts, a blank note sheet and how success is counted. Recording and data handling are listed as decisions.
User research plan
When a design decision needs user evidence, the research lead gets one study plan: what the team needs to know, what evidence already exists, method options with their hours, participant criteria, permissions needed, how answers will be read and what the study cannot establish.
Workflow inventory
When the ownership and status of your automated workflows come up for review, the platform owner gets one inventory built from the exports supplied: environments, enabled states, last run, queued runs and owner gaps. Quiet workflows become questions, not removal lists.