Capabilities directory

Find your team’s next superpower.

Results

87 capabilities, showing 1 to 24

  • Academic calendar check

    While year, term and session dates are being assembled, your registrar gets a draft calendar with every registration window tied to its term, and every conflicting, missing or out-of-bounds date listed as a question. Nothing is published or changed.

  • Affiliate onboarding

    A programme owner brings a new affiliate or creator in: the code and link the store gave are checked against the programme rules and a test at checkout, then a welcome pack and a dated first-weeks checklist are prepared. A person sends, creates and pays.

  • AI visibility audit for an online store

    A store owner or marketer gets a dated audit of how the store reads to AI assistants and shopping agents, from its own saved public pages: eighteen fixed checks with evidence, a fix list in priority order, and a record of what the assistants actually said. Nothing on the store is changed.

  • Brand strategy workshop

    Give your company one answer to why it exists, who it is for and how it sounds. Over about three hours (a planning figure, not yet timed), the owner makes the six choices that define the brand from options an AI assistant drafts, signs off the rest, and leaves with the tests that check it with real buyers.

  • Buyer security questionnaire answers

    When a buyer sends a security questionnaire, your sales owner gets a draft answer matrix: each question beside the evidence your security owner supplied, its date, its limits and a named reviewer, with stale, partial and unverifiable answers marked.

  • Campaign claim evidence register

    An account lead gets a register that pairs each draft campaign claim with the evidence the client supplied, its source date, proposed qualified wording and the approvals still missing. Unsupported or stale claims are blocked; only approved wording is released.

  • Client campaign performance report

    At the weekly or monthly reporting cutoff, the analyst gets a client report in the agency's format from the exports supplied: source figures, a drafted narrative, anomalies and discussion points. Gaps stay gaps, and every explanation is labelled a hypothesis.

  • Client document request tracker

    When a client sends its first batch of records, the engagement manager gets the request list brought up to date: each item and period marked received, incomplete, mentioned only or missing, plus a short follow-up draft. The manager judges what is sufficient and approves anything sent.

  • Client findings validation document

    Before research becomes recommendations, the engagement lead sends the client one document: each material finding beside its evidence, the implication proposed and a clear request to confirm, correct or defer it. Nothing is added that the evidence does not show.

  • Client-status update preparation

    Every client gets an accurate status update on schedule, drafted from the notes and the task list, with confirmed dates kept apart from estimates and the client’s open decisions in plain view.

  • Comparison claim check

    A manager holding a claim such as "version B converts better" and two groups of numbers gets back the method used, the size of the difference, how uncertain it is, the assumptions checked, and plain wording for what the data does and does not support. The manager decides what to do.

  • Competitor battlecard

    Your salespeople get one page on one named competitor: where it is strong, where you are stronger and the proof, what to say when it comes up, and the questions to ask. Nothing about the competitor goes on the card without a dated source; anything unsupported is held back for the approver.

  • Competitor profile from public pages

    Your marketing lead gets a dated profile of a named competitor, built only from its public pages: what they say, sell and charge, kept apart from what that suggests and the questions it raises for you. Any figure no page states is marked unavailable, never estimated.

  • Completed engagement file review

    The quality partner gets a worksheet that tests finished engagement files against the firm's own checklist: each item linked to the engagement letter, workpaper or sign-off that answers it, with any open finding, and the missing evidence listed. The quality partner confirms findings and assigns remediation.

  • Content plan

    A marketing lead with a few hours a week gets a content plan built on the questions buyers really ask: one subject for each question worth answering, the formats those hours can carry, a ranked list of what to write next, and what is held or left out, each with its reason.

  • Copy edit with a change list

    Hand over a page, an email or a brochure and get it back plainer and tighter, with no claim stronger than the statements you can support and a change list that shows every edit, its reason and any meaning it moved. You approve each change before the copy is used.

  • Course sequence and workload review

    A course lead revising an outline for the next cohort gets a module map: learning goals, prerequisites, activities and the instructor's own time estimates, with crowded weeks and coverage gaps marked and every gap written as a question. The course lead decides what changes.

  • Creative test evidence review

    When a batch of ad creative is ready for review, the creative strategist and media lead get an evidence table by creative, angle, format and hook, with tentative learning and next-test options. No winner or loser is named, and thin evidence is held back.

  • Creator brief

    A brand marketer gets one brief per creator for a campaign: the product statements the brand has cleared, word for word, the disclosure that creator's platform needs, their own code and link, the dates and the review round. Nothing reaches a creator until a person reads it and sends it.

  • Creator campaign performance report

    When a creator campaign closes, the marketing lead gets one report built from the store's own orders: what each creator brought in and cost, every creator ranked under a metric set beforehand, and a proposed next step for each. Every number is labelled measured, supplied or estimated.

  • Creator campaign plan

    Before a creator campaign starts, the marketing lead gets one plan: the goal, each creator's deal and deliverables, a base and a conservative budget checked against the budget supplied, the dates, the set-up before launch and the decisions. A person approves the spend.

  • Creator commission statement

    Each month, the finance lead gets a draft statement of what every creator has earned, worked from the store's orders export: commission under the programme's rules, flat fees, amounts carried under the minimum, and a payout list. A person approves it; finance pays.

  • Creator content approval

    A brand marketer gets a written go or no-go on a creator's draft before it goes live: every product statement checked against the brand's cleared list, the disclosure against the brand's own rules, and feedback the creator can act on without losing their voice. A person sends it.

  • Creator content reuse plan

    A brand marketer sees which published creator posts may be reused on which of the brand's channels, read only from the usage rights they supply, with every placement ending before the rights do. Where the rights are silent or unclear, the question goes to whoever reviews contracts.